Will ChatGPT make Quora obsolete?

Even if the greatest novel writers didn’t have ChatGPT back then, they did have somebody special around them who sparked ideas like a catalyst in a chemical reaction. But today, we don’t need to rely on another human for that. We can rely on Generative AI.

Post Credits:

Let’s make things even more meta.

Copilot Vision brings Microsoft's screen-watching AI to everyday Windows tasks - TechSpot

There’s an effective way to trap the opponents—by using our attacking argument as the defending argument—the symbiotic relationship we have with AI tools. Using the same attacking and defending argument will trap the opponents by rendering them off of any additional points to counter.

In ancient kingdoms, viziers were senior advisors to the king or emperor. They handled state affairs, offered counsel, and executed the ruler’s directives, much like a modern-day chief of staff.

The legendary works published by writers throughout history were crafted with the help of assistants. It’s just that AI solves the problem of hiring human assistants. Now we can have our own assistants for free (or for tiny subscription, coz… capitalism).

What are three skills that you would like to have, and why?

Or was it?

Meta-Joke = A Joke about Jokes

That’s by using AI to win the debate defending AI.

What is the moral stance on lying? Can you provide examples of when it is appropriate or inappropriate to lie? Does the Bible address this issue?

I totally disappeared from the face of Quora more than a year ago. And I reappear abruptly, out of thin air, talking about AI. Uncanny, isn’t it?

The thing is, ChatGPT existed in history—but in human form. People were creative back then because of a moderator in human form. Today, we don’t need a human moderator. Creativity will be maintained in the same way.

Viziers:

Dune Awakening players call out unfair Landsraad mechanics and ornithopters ‘goomba stomping’ in PvP - Massively Overpowered

Now, concluding my answer to your question:

So this answer was not written using AI.

To achieve feats that are greater than us, we need a greater level of assistance.

What are some ways to adjust to sleeping with one's mouth closed if they have been breathing through their mouth due to snoring and obstructive sleep apnea (OSA)?

What if this answer itself was written by ChatGPT? What if I trained ChatGPT on all of my Quora answers and taught it my language, tone, and way of writing?

Generative AI is just autocorrect on steroids. To put it simply, its main job is to predict the next word. That’s it. Although it does that thing so brilliantly that it helps us create stuff, there’s no way it would make Quora or any other creative platform or job obsolete. It’ll just reduce the labor work that doesn’t require creativity. So, if your job is pure labor and doesn’t require you to be creative, AI will probably make it obsolete. It’s always better to switch to being creative. Not only would it be engaging and healthy for your brain, but you also wouldn’t feel threatened to lose your job.

It’s by showing the symbiotic relationship we have with AI tools like ChatGPT. Tools like these cannot think for you. You have to do the thinking. Then communicate with these tools. Then the tools will behave like your assistants.

US tycoon pours $100mn into Trump crypto project after SEC reprieve - Financial Times

Amanuenses: Many famous writers employed assistants responsible for taking dictation or copying manuscripts. For example, John Milton, who was blind, dictated his epic poem Paradise Lost to amanuenses, including his daughters.

Sunny Dhondkar

The other half? — It’s to counter the chess move put forward by the opponents.

Reports: Thomas Frank to become new Tottenham Hotspur head coach - NBC Sports

That’s it. There isn’t much of a significant difference. Both superheroes work at the same creative level.

This analogy summarizes my point best:

But how does this meta-fication prove our point?

What is something you want to "get off your chest"?

I was already occupied with a lot of work, but I had this crazy little idea that made me throw away everything else and glue myself to this moment.

I’m coming for you, humans.

ChatGPT will not make Quora (or any other platform) obsolete.

What story do you have involving a public restroom?

Although, this level of comparison isn’t totally valid right now because what we are dealing with currently is Generative Artificial Intelligence and not Artificial General Intelligence. There’s way more to go for us to reach that level.

ChatGPT is like Dr. Watson to Sherlock Holmes. Alfred to Batman. There’s even a software called Alfred for Mac systems. I personally use it. There’s a reason why it was named Alfred. It proves that in this modern world, you don’t need to be a billionaire like Bruce Wayne to have your personal butler.

Well… now we’ve put forth our chess move. That’s half of what it takes to win a debate.

Trump: The war between Israel and Iran should end - Axios

Meta-Learning = Learning about Learning

Tony Stark (Iron Man) has an AI moderator: Jarvis.

I would never use AI to write a Quora answer. I’ve got a different kind of attachment with Quora. Quora was the first platform I started creating content on. I’ve got a special corner for the people on Quora who have been reading my answers.

So the crazy little idea was to make the debate Meta.

I collected every point I had discussed with her in Instagram DMs and fed those points to ChatGPT, asking it to lead them to a final conclusion. Furthermore, I asked it to create a PDF of the conclusion points and send it to me.

A sort of Meta-AI thing.

Nah, I’m just kidding.

Now it was up to her to perform well in the debate.

Or am I?

Meta-Discussion = Discussion about Discussion

Is this AI as Sunny? Or Sunny as AI? Or just AI?

The next day, I received her text:

Examples:

Or is it?

So, I asked her to roughly formulate what the potential moves of her opponents might be.

Alright.

Well, well, well.

I sent this PDF to my follower and asked her to use the same conclusion points to conclude her debate:

A couple of months ago, I received these texts from one of my followers on Instagram:

Calm down. It’s Sunny this side.

Before we proceed, you should be aware of the prefix Meta.

A vizier obviously has more knowledge than the king. But it doesn’t make him more capable than the king. The vizier helps, but the king makes the call. Just like AI is more potent than a human, but it doesn’t make it the main element.

That’ll be done by bringing forth the historical term Amanuenses.

Alfred supports Batman on a personal and ethical level, whereas Jarvis is more of a technical and operational assistant for Iron Man.

Another great historical reference would be that of Viziers.

So I replied to her texts with this:

This is what she replied with:

Now, you’re about to experience a little heist we pulled.

Well… No.

Hahaha.

What if all of this is being written by an AI?

Just like Alexander the Great being tutored by Aristotle.

As you will see, this crazy little idea would help her win this debate competition against 20 other teams (even though she had less than 12 hours to prepare) and will also answer your question. So stay with me.

Alfred is Batman's butler, mentor, and moral compass. He provides emotional support, wisdom, and logistical help, acting as a human companion who ensures Bruce Wayne remains grounded. The relationship is deeply personal and rooted in trust and loyalty.

So, basically, for her to win the debate competition, she would need to prove that AI (tools like ChatGPT) does not hinder the art of creative thinking in humans.

Jarvis (Just A Rather Very Intelligent System) is an artificial intelligence that assists Tony Stark (Iron Man) with a wide range of tasks, from managing his suits to offering tactical advice. Jarvis represents advanced technology, providing efficient, data-driven assistance without emotional nuance.

Bruce Wayne (Batman) has a human moderator: Alfred.

I can’t explain the joy that ran through my nerves seeing we were able to pull off such a heist.

Meta-X = X about X